The French are stubborn.  Germans are meticulous.  The British are intelligent.

National stereotypes are not always fair and should be challenged.  However, they’re also powerful, resistant to change and widely held.  To illustrate, try the following.  Type ‘why do French’ into Google and look at the auto-complete options.  These include ‘…people eat snails’ and ‘…people stare’.

Try the same for British, Italian or any other nationality.  An amusing exercise but one with a serious undertone.  Google is smart.  Its auto-complete tool is based on huge amounts of search history and a sophisticated algorithm.  This implies that phrases like these represent common perceptions.

National stereotypes also apply to companies and their products (think Siemens, Aeroflot, Fujitsu).  Add to this the oft forgotten fact that B2B buyers are human.  They’re as susceptible to stereotypical views as anyone.  Various academic studies support this and show that even in B2B contexts the ‘made in’ label triggers beliefs about quality, reliability, innovation and price.

As marketers we need to take notice of this, especially when migrating a product from its home market to new shores.  In these circumstances national associations can have a strong bearing on the optimum brand positioning and communications strategy.  For example, Aeroflot might have a tougher time persuading UK buyers of their shipment reliability than Lufthansa.

As Research Manager at British Airways my colleague Andy Booth devised a four step process for managing brands with a prominent (explicit or implicit) ‘made in’ label.

  1. Identify attributes of the ideal brand in your product/service category
  2. Identify attributes associated with the ‘made in’ label and whether these are positive, negative or neutral in your product/service category
  3. Identify attributes associated with your brand (whether derived from the national stereotype or independent of this)
  4. Plot 1 – 3 in a Venn diagram to create a positioning blue print which prioritises positive and downplays sub-optimal elements of national heritage (all in the context of aspiring to the nationality independent ideal)

Read more about our approach to business-to-business (B2B) branding research.

Enjoyed this post?  Subscribe and receive new posts by email or RSS

Connect with Andrew on Twitter or Google+

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent posts

Inside-out brand research

How can we ensure actionable results?

The British Research Barometer: An insight into the insight industry


B2B marketing

Business trends

Employee research

Generate and test new B2B product and service concepts

Identify the optimum B2B brand positioning

Identify the optimum B2B pricing model and point

Improve customer satisfaction and loyalty

Map the B2B buying journey and drivers of supplier choice

Map the B2B market structure and profile competitors

Market research design and methods

News about Circle Research

Segment based on behaviours, needs and attitudes

Support B2B thought leadership & PR

Track and manage B2B brand perceptions


About Andrew

Andrew has specialised in B2B research for over a decade and co-founded Circle Research in 2006. He is a columnist for B2B Marketing Magazine, a regular contributor to Research Live and frequent speaker at leading events such as the B2B Leaders Forum, Customer Experience Live and the Social Media World Forum. Andrew is a Chartered Member of the MRS, teaches the MRS B2B research course and holds an MA in Psychology from Aberdeen University alongside an MSc in Marketing from Strathclyde University.

Follow us

© Circle Research 2018 | Registered in England: 5669149