What you see isn’t always what you get.

Horse meat in our Findus Crispy Pancakes.  Sub-prime mortgages hidden within bundles of triple-A rated loans.  Dodgy surveys parading as fact.

This deception – whether intentional or accidental – has far-reaching repercussions.  In the case of faulty research it can lead to sub-optimal decisions and missed opportunities.  And it’s an easy mistake to make.  Statistics carry a sense of authority and it seems counter-intuitive to challenge the statement that ‘customers told us’.  But challenge we should.

Next time survey numbers are presented as conclusive fact, here are three questions you might want to ask.

Who was surveyed? 

The power of surveys is that by speaking with just a proportion of the target market, the likely opinion of all can be deduced.  However, this is only true if two criteria are met.

First, the survey must comprise sufficient responses to justify the label ‘reliable’.

Second, it is essential that those responses reflect the market structure.  Here a lot of surveys fall down.  In their quest for capturing as many opinions as possible, they fail to ensure that more weight is given to proportionately larger (or more important) groups.

No really, who was surveyed?

Dig a bit deeper and sometimes you’ll find the horse meat – survey respondents who look legitimate, but aren’t.

So ask who was invited to participate in the survey.  Was it a controlled, vetted list or could anyone respond?

Ask what steps were taken to screen out inappropriate respondents.  Was everyone posed non-leading questions to determine their role and level of authority?

Ask if any checks on identity have been conducted post-survey.  Are we confident that people are who they claim to be?

Who wasn’t surveyed?

Just as important is to understand who might have been excluded from the survey and whether their absence may distort the picture.  The principle consideration here is methodology (online, telephone, etc.) as not all survey techniques provide an equal opportunity for the target market to respond.

Tuck in!

Enjoyed this post?  Subscribe and receive new posts by email or RSS

Connect with Andrew on Twitter or Google+

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent posts

Inside-out brand research

How can we ensure actionable results?

The British Research Barometer: An insight into the insight industry


B2B marketing

Business trends

Employee research

Generate and test new B2B product and service concepts

Identify the optimum B2B brand positioning

Identify the optimum B2B pricing model and point

Improve customer satisfaction and loyalty

Map the B2B buying journey and drivers of supplier choice

Map the B2B market structure and profile competitors

Market research design and methods

News about Circle Research

Segment based on behaviours, needs and attitudes

Support B2B thought leadership & PR

Track and manage B2B brand perceptions


About Andrew

Andrew has specialised in B2B research for over a decade and co-founded Circle Research in 2006. He is a columnist for B2B Marketing Magazine, a regular contributor to Research Live and frequent speaker at leading events such as the B2B Leaders Forum, Customer Experience Live and the Social Media World Forum. Andrew is a Chartered Member of the MRS, teaches the MRS B2B research course and holds an MA in Psychology from Aberdeen University alongside an MSc in Marketing from Strathclyde University.

Follow us

© Circle Research 2018 | Registered in England: 5669149